Resource Guide
Staffing Model Comparison Guide
A comprehensive comparison of healthcare staffing models to help facility decision-makers choose the right approach for their clinical workforce needs.
Contract Staffing vs. Permanent Placement vs. Internal PRN
| Feature | Contract Staffing | Permanent Placement | Internal PRN |
|---|---|---|---|
| Time to Fill | 1-2 weeks | 4-8 weeks | Immediate (if available) |
| Duration | 4-26 weeks | Permanent | Shift-by-shift |
| Cost Structure | Higher hourly, no benefits | Lower hourly, full benefits | Higher hourly, minimal benefits |
| Flexibility | High - adjustable assignments | Low - long-term commitment | Very High - on-demand |
| Quality Control | Agency-verified credentials | Direct facility control | Known staff |
| Best For | Coverage gaps, seasonal needs | Building core team | Short-term fluctuations |
Detailed Model Breakdown
Contract Staffing
Pros:
- Rapid deployment to address urgent staffing needs
- Access to specialized clinical expertise
- No long-term commitment or benefits overhead
Cons:
- Higher hourly rates than permanent staff
- Learning curve for facility-specific protocols
Permanent Placement
Pros:
- Long-term stability and team cohesion
- Lower long-term costs
- Direct control over onboarding and development
Cons:
- Longer recruitment timelines
- Higher benefits and overhead costs
Internal PRN
Pros:
- Familiar with facility protocols and culture
- Immediate availability (if scheduled)
Cons:
- Limited pool size and availability
- Unpredictable coverage for larger gaps
Need Help Choosing the Right Model?
Our staffing consultants can help you assess your needs and design a customized workforce strategy.
Contact Our Team